Majority of DB schemes considering surplus extraction

More than half (57 per cent) of UK defined benefit (DB) pension schemes are considering surplus extraction during run-on, buyout, or in the years leading up to endgame, according to a report from Legal & General (L&G).

Its Endgame Insights report, which drew on a trustee survey conducted in partnership with the Pensions Management Institute (PMI), explored how rising funding levels were influencing trustees as they approached endgame and the trends shaping endgame strategies.

A “clear majority” of schemes expected insurance to play a key role in their de-risking journey, while a “notable proportion” were exploring run-on approaches, either as a long-term strategy or prior to securing members’ benefits with an insurer.

Over half (57 per cent) of DB schemes were actively considering surplus extraction, which L&G said was consistent with its practical experience, where 24 schemes that moved to buyout in 2025 used surplus to enhance member benefits.

The report noted that trustees and sponsors had been navigating significant shifts in endgame planning over the past year amid rising funding levels, regulatory reform, and a broader set of strategic options.

Almost half (49 per cent) of schemes were now fully funded on a buyout basis, putting endgame planning high on the agenda.

With the government looking to make it easier for well-funded DB schemes to release surplus, trustees considering surplus extraction had mixed preferences for how that surplus should be used.

Enhancing DB scheme member benefits was highlighted as the top priority, closely followed by supporting a defined contribution scheme or returning surplus to the sponsor, while investing in UK assets was seen as the lowest priority.

The report also found confidence in smaller schemes being a significant part of buy-in and buyout transaction volumes going forward, with 84 per cent of respondents believing that being a smaller scheme would not inhibit ability to transact.

When asked about progress on the expected time between buy-in and buyout, 34 per cent of respondents who had completed a buy-in expected to move to buyout within two years, while 41 per cent planned to do so within three to five years.

“The UK’s DB landscape is entering a new phase of maturity,” commented L&G head of UK – institutional & wholesale, asset management, Mark Johnson.

“Our new research shows that schemes now have more choice than ever and endgame is front and centre of their agendas.

“The trustees we speak to are actively considering how they might use surplus, settle their liabilities via an insurer or superfund, or run-on for longer.”

This article was originally published on our sister website, Pensions Age.



Share Story:

Recent Stories


Podcast: Stepping up to the challenge
In the latest European Pensions podcast, Natalie Tuck talks to PensionsEurope chair, Jerry Moriarty, about his new role and the European pension policy agenda

Podcast: The benefits of private equity in pension fund portfolios
The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, in which stock markets have seen increased volatility, combined with global low interest rates has led to alternative asset classes rising in popularity. Private equity is one of the top runners in this category, and for good reason.

In this podcast, Munich Private Equity Partners Managing Director, Christopher Bär, chats to European Pensions Editor, Natalie Tuck, about the benefits private equity investments can bring to pension fund portfolios and the best approach to take.

Mitigating risk
BNP Paribas Asset Management’s head of pension solutions, Julien Halfon, discusses equity hedging with Laura Blows

Advertisement